Pen vs Keyboard: What Science Really Says About Handwriting and Memory
Quick answer: Writing by hand engages more of your brain than typing, and it clearly helps young children learn letters. For note-taking in class, the evidence is more mixed than viral headlines suggest. The smartest approach: take notes by hand in your own words, then revise by testing yourself – highlighting alone is one of the weakest study methods.
Key takeaways
- A 2024 Norwegian EEG study found handwriting produced far wider brain connectivity than typing.
- Pre-school children who printed letters by hand – not typed or traced them – activated the brain's reading circuit.
- The famous 2014 "pen beats laptop" study was not consistently replicated in 2019.
- Highlighting helps a little with remembering facts, but self-testing and spaced revision work much better.
The study that started it all: "The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard"
In 2014, psychologists Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer ran three experiments with university students. Those who took notes on laptops did worse on conceptual questions than those who wrote by hand. Their explanation: laptop users tended to copy lectures word for word, while hand-writers had to summarise ideas in their own words – which forces deeper thinking.
…but science kept checking
In 2019, researchers Morehead, Dunlosky and Rawson repeated the study and found the results "did not consistently differ" between laptop and longhand groups. Their analysis showed only a small, non-significant advantage for handwriting. The honest conclusion: how you take notes (in your own words vs copying) may matter more than what you write with.
What happens in your brain when you write by hand
In January 2024, Audrey van der Meer and Ruud van der Weel at NTNU in Norway fitted 36 students with caps holding 256 EEG sensors. When students wrote by hand, their brains showed much more widespread connectivity than when they typed. It's a fascinating finding – with one caveat: the study measured brain activity, not exam marks, and the sample was small.
Why handwriting matters most for young kids
Indiana University researchers Karin James and Laura Engelhardt studied pre-school children aged about 4–5 who had not yet learned to read. The children learned letters by printing them, typing them or tracing them, then had brain scans. Only handwriting switched on the brain's "reading circuit". That's a strong reason to keep pencils and practice notebooks in early learning.
Do highlighters actually help you study?
A landmark 2013 review by John Dunlosky and colleagues rated 10 study techniques. Practice testing and distributed (spaced) practice were rated highly effective. Highlighting, rereading and summarising were rated "low utility". A 2022 meta-analysis softened this a little: highlighting you do yourself helps memory of facts (modestly), and highlighting provided by a teacher helps even more.
A science-backed study routine using pen and paper
- Write notes by hand, in your own words – don't copy the textbook.
- Highlight only key terms with a highlighter – one colour per idea type.
- Turn highlights into questions in the margin.
- Close the book and self-test – write answers from memory.
- Revise in gaps: after 1 day, 3 days and 1 week.
FAQs
Is writing by hand better for memory than typing?
Handwriting engages the brain more widely, but for note-taking the evidence is mixed. Writing in your own words and self-testing matter most.
Does highlighting help you study?
A little, mainly for recalling facts. It's much less effective than practice testing and spaced revision.
Should kids learn handwriting before typing?
Research on pre-school children found that printing letters by hand activated reading-related brain areas, while typing and tracing did not.
What is the best study technique according to science?
Practice testing (quizzing yourself) and spaced practice are rated the most effective in a major 2013 review.
Save this post for exam season and follow @soulwaveein on Instagram for study-desk setups and stationery hacks. Build your kit from our school supplies.
Sources
- Mueller & Oppenheimer (2014), Psychological Science
- Morehead, Dunlosky & Rawson (2019), Educational Psychology Review
- Van der Meer & Van der Weel (2024), Frontiers in Psychology
- James & Engelhardt (2012), Trends in Neuroscience and Education
- Dunlosky et al. (2013), Psychological Science in the Public Interest
- Ponce, Mayer & Méndez (2022), Educational Psychology Review


